Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 1 Votes - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Karl Radl-Victates: Anti-Race Communist
11-20-2013, 09:36 AM
Post: #1
Karl Radl-Victates: Anti-Race Communist
Karl Radl-Victates: Anti-Race Communist

http://eireanngoddess.blogspot.com.au/20...white.html

Karl Radl is essentially an Anti-Racist, he doesn't believe in the concept and identity of the White Race.


Karl Radl: "White’ remains undefined and unclassified"

Karl Radl: "Some would immediately retort that the later is incompatible with White Nationalism, because it is the creation of jews and so forth. However this objection is easily removed when we understand that White Nationalism hasn’t defined itself beyond the ‘14 words’ and hence has no views on jews, because ‘White’ remains undefined and unclassified and also because White Nationalism takes no point of view or defines its perception of economic matters. Communism is a political adjective," He thinks mixed-race Semites-Caucasoids are just Caucasoids. He doesn't perceive mixed-race as mixed-race. I know Ashkenazi Jews have the same problem, they see themselves as White, Caucasian, Caucasoid, when in fact they are mixed race.

* see the Cuvier biography and his racial term "White" race.


Karl Radl: "Communist White Nationalists"

Karl Radl: "For example: if one is to say one is a White Nationalist one has to clarify specific points of one’s own leanings. Somebody could correctly say ‘I am a Capitalist White Nationalist’ and in the same vein one could also say ‘I am a Communist White Nationalist’".



Karl Radl: Contradicts himself says Politics is Economics

The difference is obviously large, because National Socialism with its defined state can begin to interpret and propagate itself according to its basic principles, but with ‘White Nationalism’ being undefined it cannot, but rather because it only rests on a single principle. It becomes a label, which must be combined with other labels to give a complete world view. For example: if one is to say one is a White Nationalist one has to clarify specific points of one’s own leanings. Somebody could correctly say ‘I am a Capitalist White Nationalist’ and in the same vein one could also say ‘I am a Communist White Nationalist’.

Some would immediately retort that the later is incompatible with White Nationalism, because it is the creation of jews and so forth. However this objection is easily removed when we understand that White Nationalism hasn’t defined itself beyond the ‘14 words’ and hence has no views on jews, because ‘White’ remains undefined and unclassified and also because White Nationalism takes no point of view or defines its perception of economic matters. Communism is a political adjective, but a defined one, rather than a world view."


http://whiteheritage.org/showthread.php?mode=threaded&tid=359&pid=1911

Karl Radl: Why the Contradiction? Lying or Intellectual Dishonesty? Are you trying to sell Jew Communism?


Notice the weak, dishonest, and contradictory mind: He states that there can be a "Communist White Nationalist" because communism is about economic matters ("perception of economic matters"), but then states communism is about political matters ("Communism is a political adjective"). First he says Communism is economic, so a White Nationalist could be Communist or Capitalist, then defines Communism as only political, thus his statement "a Communist White Nationalist (is valid)" is in fact a contradiction. Perhaps the contradiction is in his mind, perhaps he is trying to sell us something untrue. Probably both as a Jewish fanatic would. So, "Karl", is Communism political or economic? If it is political, as you have said, then there can be no "Communist White Nationalist", as that is a political entity, nation being a polity.


Karl Radl: Anti-Racist

Karl Radl: "National Socialist ideology specifically rejects non-Germanic Europeans: such as Slavs and Med. Racial groups." Slav and Med are ethnic groups, not Racial groups. The Slavs and Meds are ethnic groups within the White Race. By not recognizing the Races, the White Race composed of all ethnic groups, Karl Radl is an Anti-Racist. He denies the existence of the White Race, says Slavs are their own "Race".

In conclusion see the Anti-Race Karl Radl in his saying there can be "Communist White Nationalists" and "White race" doesn't exist.

http://whiteheritage.org/showthread.php?mode=threaded&tid=359&pid=1911
http://eireanngoddess.blogspot.com.au/20...white.html

Karl Radl says the White race is not defined. Says Meds and Slavs are a "different Race" from Germanics, i.e. the White Race does not exist in his anti-race dogma. Says there can be Communist White Nationalists. He sounds like an anti-White marxist pretending to be NS. Nowhere in the NSDAP do they say there can be Communist White Nationalists.


The White Race Defined by Anthropology well before 1930


Linnaeus
Carolus Linnaeus, (J. H. Scheffel, 1739)

Carl Linnaeus (1707–1778), the physician, botanist, and zoologist, who established the taxonomic bases of binomial nomenclature for fauna and flora, was a pioneer researcher in biologically defining human species. In Systema Naturae (1767), he established five human-race taxa: (i) the Americanus, (ii) the Asiaticus, (iii) the Africanus, (iv) the Europeanus, and (v) the Monstrosus, based upon geographic origin and skin color.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_...l_Linnaeus


*Cuvier
Georges Cuvier (1769–1832) the French naturalist and zoologist racial studies influenced scientific polygenism and scientific racialism. Cuvier believed there were three distinct races the Caucasian (white), Mongolian (yellow) and the Ethiopian (black). He thought Adam and Eve were Caucasian and that was the original race of mankind, and the other two races arose by survivors' escaping in different directions after a major catastrophe hit the earth 5,000 years ago. He theorized that the survivors lived in complete isolation from each other and developed separately.[9][10]

Cuvier thought the Caucasian skull was the most beautifully shaped. He divided humanity into three races: white, yellow and black, and rated each for the beauty or ugliness of the skull and quality of their civilizations. According to Cuvier, a European, the White race was at the top, and the black race was at the bottom.[11]

Cuvier wrote about Caucasians (Europeans):

" The white race, with oval face, straight hair and nose, to which the civilised people of Europe belong and which appear to us the most beautiful of all, is also superior to others by its genius, courage and activity.[12]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_...ges_Cuvier



Agassiz
Louis Agassiz Diversity of Origin of the Human Races.
http://whiteheritage.org/printthread.php?tid=297

It is funny when the great scientist and zoologist Linnaeus defines the European race, which scientist and zoologist Cuvier calls it the "White" race, but "Karl Radl" decides to say the Slavs are a separate race. It is even more amusing when one realizes that Karl Radl's degree isn't in biology or zoology. It is funny to see Karl Radl pretend ignorance of Cuvier and like most ARA commies, and mixed-race Jews, deny that the White Race exists.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
12-26-2013, 08:39 PM
Post: #2
RE: Karl Radl-Victates: Anti-Race Communist
I did search for "Victates" on Stormfront and he comes up as constantly defending the Jews of their crimes in communist USSR.
Find all posts by this user
Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump:


User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)